Skip to content
Menu
Box Thoughts
  • Home
  • About Me
  • LinkedIn
Box Thoughts
October 14, 2014

99% reliability in something used daily is not very good.

Directv has recently been running a ton of commercials featuring Rob Lowe.  One of them in particular bugs me – it’s the one that talks about their 99% reliability.  Not 99.99% reliability – just 99%.  Just to verify, I went to their website which says the same thing (screengrab below):

directtvreliability

 

99% reliability.  Said another way, 99 days out of 100 it works.  Said yet another way expect to have a non-working signal between 3 and 4 days every single year.  Said yet another way, expect to have a non-working signal half a week every year.

Suddenly it doesn’t sound all that great.

They get away with it because people are generally bad at crunching these kinds of numbers.  99% reliability sounds great but imagine if 1 out of every 100 text message you sent just didn’t get through to who you were sending it to, it would cause havoc.

These things are important.  You are being told you are being sold a fairly unreliable service (in my opinion) but they are positioning it as if it is a strength because they don’t think you are going to actually do the math.

If they wanted to sell me on customer service, great – I’m buying.  If they wanted to sell me on a better user experience in general, excellent – I’m all for it.  But don’t try to pretend something bad is something good.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

2 thoughts on “99% reliability in something used daily is not very good.”

  1. David Lobel says:
    October 16, 2014 at 1:30 am

    David, great point (observation) but do you believe they’re really saying “99%” or because it is visually more appealing (Marketing) than the longer string of “99.99%”? I believe the latter.

    I like how you went out of the box to bring reality to what is actually being said, but I wonder if they knew that as well and ignored it because they felt John Q. Public won’t look into the ad that deep, or their Marketing group just doesn’t own a calculator?

    I wonder if they have SLA’s with their customers like we do with ours?

    Reply
  2. dmusic604 says:
    October 17, 2014 at 10:52 am

    You are exactly on point because either one of your scenarios is an equally poor reflection on them. Either they have poor service that they don’t think they will get called on or they have great service but are willing to brand it as poor because they don’t think they will get called on it.

    When was the last time your cable company provided you with any type of SLA? We are talking about one of the most poorly reviewed customer service industries here.

    Reply

Leave a Reply to dmusic604Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Commercial real estate and Proptech are the antithesis of winner-takes-all industries
  • A tool for making shift management and occupancy easier
  • Seasonality matters in your CRE data
  • CBRE’s 2025 Americas Occupier Sentiment Survey report is a full encapsulation of the current corporate real estate conversation.
  • So what?

analysis bias change change program collaboration Communication CRE culture data decision making demand design experience failure fear finance flex flexibility future growth hybrid idea innovation leadership managing mandate metrics modeling office personal planning portfolio productivity program management quality relationships risk strategy success team technology trust WFH work Workplace

©2025 Box Thoughts | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!