Skip to content
Menu
Box Thoughts
  • Home
  • About Me
  • LinkedIn
Box Thoughts
July 24, 2014

What Uber-ish technology would really mean to #CRE.

Disruption is a crazy thing.  It’s uncontrollable, unpredictable, good, bad, necessary and evil all in equal parts depending on where you sit and live.  These days everyone seems to think Uber is the darling of disruption and uses it to talk about what will happen to their industry.  But the lesson of Uber is often mis-interpreted in the telling.

Uber is about information and control.  Previously taxi companies had it all.  They had pricing dictated by local government and had the only rights to picking up passengers on the street.  Sure, black cars did some as well but they were a bit limited.  Uber changed everything by cutting out the middleman.  No longer did you have to have a taxi medallion to drive people around.  As passengers you no longer had to fish around for a phone number or hope for someone to drive by.  Information flows freely and control in the middle has been cut out.

If you apply the same situation to real estate you see something significant happen.  An Uber style disruption in CRE would be all about connecting lessees to landlords without any assistance in the middle.  Terms would be pre-determined by that middle-ware provider, location metrics would guide the lessee to buildings that meet their needs, rates and terms would be automatically assigned the lease based on market dynamics as determined by the technology.  Landlords give up some negotiation control and lessees take on more market search work themselves but largely the technology serves to ensure that both sides meet at a middle ground.

This scenario cuts out the brokers – which is major disruption.  It potentially changes the entire compensation model of the entire industry!  Right now brokers function to ensure that clients and landlords meet and negotiate on even footing while making sure that clients get the right solution.  It’s a manual process that would be difficult if not impossible to automate.  It’s a matter of working out the conditions and functions to allow that equal footing and then getting people to sign-up.

But that’s the thing, everyone thought the same about the taxi industry – couldn’t be done.  Yet here we are.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Commercial real estate and Proptech are the antithesis of winner-takes-all industries
  • A tool for making shift management and occupancy easier
  • Seasonality matters in your CRE data
  • CBRE’s 2025 Americas Occupier Sentiment Survey report is a full encapsulation of the current corporate real estate conversation.
  • So what?

analysis bias change change program collaboration Communication CRE culture data decision making demand design experience failure fear finance flex flexibility future growth hybrid idea innovation leadership managing mandate metrics modeling office personal planning portfolio productivity program management quality relationships risk strategy success team technology trust WFH work Workplace

©2025 Box Thoughts | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!