Skip to content
Menu
Box Thoughts
  • Home
  • About Me
  • LinkedIn
Box Thoughts
March 21, 2014

How are Bitcoins similar to real estate?

At first glance, Bitcoins and real estate have very little in common.  The first exists only in digital form and is invested in or exchanged for good and services.  The second is physical properties that people occupy – sometimes they own, sometimes they rent, sometimes they dabble in a bit of both.

However, there are similarities.  Both are limited goods that fluctuate in price based on market behavior.  Neither are generally traded on an open market like a stock or bond.  Both derive their value from what others are willing to pay for it.  Neither are technically currency.  Both increase in total amounts following known (or predictable) trends and ownership of any given asset can be determined with a bit of work.

Your first question might be – so what?  To you I invite to stop here as you are probably not going to be interested in the rest.  To those that are intrigued by this vague connection, continue along with my thought processes.

The similarities between the two are surprisingly close once you zoom in further:

  • Both are defined by quantities that can be continually reduced (1 bitcoin is the unit of measure but you can own .000000001 bitcoins if you so wanted just as theoretically could could lease or own .0000000001 square feet of a building).
  • Each is a decentralized system where anyone can buy, sell, exchange their ownership to anyone else (it’s easier in Bitcoin than CRE but ease is merely a financial issue largely).
  • New quantities of each don’t simply spring to life.  They are based on known quantities that increase at some rate.

However, it’s the difference between the two that point to issues of CRE being the next Bitcoin:

  • Bitcoins are digital while real estate is the definition of physical.
  • Every bitcoin is exactly the same as the others while every building is different (every square foot is different).
  • Bitcoins were created as a store of value and exchange while real estate was created as a place for people to live or work.
  • Anyone (theoretically) can create new real estate where as bitcoins are created by an algorithm on a known schedule.

Why do I mention this?  It feels like real estate was Bitcoins before Bitcoins.  The more I look at it from different angles it should be (theoretically) possible to use real estate as a broader store of value.  Not easily – but possible.

Share this:

  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • More
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Workplace operations is about balancing static vs. dynamic delivery trade-offs.
  • Commercial real estate and Proptech are the antithesis of winner-takes-all industries
  • A tool for making shift management and occupancy easier
  • Seasonality matters in your CRE data
  • CBRE’s 2025 Americas Occupier Sentiment Survey report is a full encapsulation of the current corporate real estate conversation.

analysis bias change change program collaboration Communication CRE culture data decision making demand design experience failure fear finance flex flexibility future growth hybrid idea innovation leadership managing mandate metrics modeling people personal planning portfolio productivity program management quality relationships risk strategy success team technology trust WFH work Workplace

©2026 Box Thoughts | Powered by WordPress and Superb Themes!